I think Chuck has nailed it. There isn't enough information to draw any conclusions - only that something went wrong and Eric B was at blame.
Whatever transpired 2+ years ago, is over. It's time to move on. It is bewildering why a moderator of such a forum would open this topic and send a mass email to engage the debate. It's funny that all the questions proposed in the email only implicate Eric B. This thread and its creation has obvious intentions, just as the website created to slight Eric B's character. I love how the author claims the website was created to find out if there was 'any good that came of the project' and yet the only thing I find at that site is data implicating Eric B, and nothing to do with the progression or conclusion of the project. Keep playing it off as 'take it up with the NOAA as I only have what they have sent' but the fact is that what you have presented is only a partial element of the story. You post it and assume people to make conclusions and interpretations... like Chuck said, the data on that site is only partial and conclusions are simply conjecture.
|