"Look, if you want to argue that Mr. Borneman is a good guy who simply made a mistake, fine. You can sing that to your heart's content. But that doesn't change anything. You can't argue for someone's innocence by pointing out the faults of others. It just doesn't work that way."
I'm simply argueing the case that a man should be presumed innocent untill proven guilty, and so far, you have not proven anything except to throw an incomplete story out and make a lot of accusations based on such. You claim to be a law student?
By the way, sorry I took so long to reply, I actualy had something more constructive to take care of, such as visiting a survey site and setting some frags from my tank onto a newly algae cleared coral head. What have you done today besides beat the crap out of someone based on the very limited info you have?
Chuck
|