"Yes, it COULD have been a verbal misunderstanding. "
And yet you continue to make assumptions and accusations while conceding that fact. Simply amazing.
The article was written as is simply because the reporter knew that without all of the facts as you have presented them, they could not start flinging accusations as you wish they had done. Your disappointment is quite obvious. Had this article been flaming Eric hardcore, you would have been holding it up for all to see while shouting "See what I did!!!"
Face it, the only "thing" that will come of all of this is that you will have been revealed and thats about it. Yeah, maybe ten more hobbyists will have decided that they don't like Eric, in a world wide audience, whooppeee. While hundreds will have learned to associate your name with witch hunts, as happened with the "bomber" investigation, and that went...where?
|